Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 564 S.W.2d 71 - State v. Howard

State v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably State v. Buckles (1982), State v. King (1979)

26 state decisions

16019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Moses · State v. Stevens · State v. Sanders · State v. Tyson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen a motion to suppress evidence is denied and the evidence subsequently offered at the trial, defendant must then object to the admission of the evidence with a proper statement of the reasons for the objection, present the matter in his motion for a new trial, and brief the issue on appeal in order to preserve it for appellate review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““546.070. Order of trial. — The jury being impaneled and sworn, the trial may proceed in the following order: * * * * * (4) Whether requested or not, the court must instruct the jury in writing upon all questions of law arising in the case which are necessary for their information in giving their verdict; which instructions shall include, whenever necessary, the subjects of good character and reasonable doubt; and a failure to so instruct in cases of felony shall be good cause, when the defendant is found guilty, for setting aside the verdict of the jury and granting a new trial . . . ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.