Easley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 62 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably McDuff v. State (1997), Emery v. State (1994)
2 federal appellate · 62 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · United States v. Ewell · Smith v. Hooey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the length of the delay; (2) the reason for the delay; (3) the defendant’s assertion of the right; and (4) the prejudice to the defendant resulting from the delay.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Carney v. State · Grayless v. State“A deliberate attempt to delay the trial in order to hamper the defense should be weighted heavily against the government. A more neutral reason such as negligence or overcrowded courts should be weighted less heavily but nevertheless should be considered since the ultimate responsibility for such circumstances must rest with the government rather than with the defendant. Finally, a valid reason, such as a missing witness, should serve to justify appropriate delay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hernandez“It is not necessary ... that every fact point directly and independently to the guilt of the accused, and the cumulative force of all the incriminating circum stances may be sufficient to warrant a conclusion of guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ortiz v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.