Ex Parte Mangrum’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably Thomas v. State (1981), Quick v. City of Austin (1999)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Chambers · United States v. Tynen · 26 Cal. 2d 297 - Sekt v. Justice's Court · Dockery v. State · Oddo v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the penalty, forfeiture, or punishment for any offense is reduced by a reenactment, revision, or amendment of a statute, the penalty, forfeiture, or punishment, if not already imposed, shall be imposed according to the statute as amended.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Davis v. State · Wilson v. State“The rule was founded on the theory that the Legislature by its repeal determined that the conduct in question should no longer be prosecuted as a crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mullen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.