564 S.W.3d
Volume 564 — South Western Reporter, Third Series
118 opinions
- 564 S.W.3d 1Freestone Power Generation, LLC v. Tex. Comm'n on Envtl. Quality (2017)
- 564 S.W.3d 15Int'l Bus. Machs. Corp. v. Lufkin Indus., Inc. (2017)
- 564 S.W.3d 38City of Tyler v. Owens (2017)
- 564 S.W.3d 49Dolores Narvaez, Luis Narvaez, Eduardo Velarde Betancourt, Jose Juan Velarde Avila, Julieta Duran, Luz Magdalena Escobar, and Jose Antonio Velarde Juarez v. Darron Powell, Darron Powell, PLLC, Hector Phillips, and Hector Phillips, P.C. (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 58In re State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 68Roddy Harrison, as Trustee of the Harrison Trust v. Rosetta Resources Operating, LP (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 75Terri Porter Garcia v. the Travis Law Firm, P.C. (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 97Wendy Younger v. El Paso County Emergency Services District No. 2 and El Paso County, Texas (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 150De Avila v. Espinoza Metal Bldg. & Roofing Contractors (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 167Fortitude Energy, LLC v. Sooner Pipe LLC (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 190Dileep Puppala, M. D. v. James Reid Perry (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 203Ex Parte Christian Sauder (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 216Ricardo G. Rodriguez v. David G. Marcus, as Receiver of KF Logistics, Inc. (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 223Abel Galindo v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 228the El Paso Education Initiative, Inc., D/B/A Burnham Wood Charter School v. Amex Properties, LLC (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 248Ark. Oil & Gas Comm'n v. Hurd (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 259Dednam v. State (2019)
- 564 S.W.3d 262Andreasen v. S. Mountain Estates Prop. Owners Ass'n (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 268Chavez v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 283Davis v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 289Gray v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 291Makinson v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 296Keith v. Dir., Dep't of Workforce Servs. (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 299Dye v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 309Hearst v. Newcomb (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 316Jeffers v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 317Commercial Fitness Concepts, LLC v. WGL, LLC (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 322Tavadia v. Mitchell (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 331Sidebottom v. Watershed Equine, LLC (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 335Jensen v. Commonwealth (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 339State v. Callaghan (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 345Strange v. Robinson (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 351Tan-Tar-A Estates, L.L.C. v. Steiner (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 353Shelby v. Mo. Dep't of Corr. (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 354State v. Dierks (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 364Nicolazzi v. Bone (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 376State v. Tucker (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 380Sanders v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 386Conn v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 388Allen v. Norman (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 393Fogelsong v. Joe Machens Auto. Grp., Inc. (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 399Cowans v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 400Earleywine v. Earleywine (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 400Higgins v. Gutierrez (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 401Dovenmuehle Mortg., Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 401Correll v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 402Pipes v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 403Smith v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 403State v. Davis (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 404State v. Owen (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 404Howery v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 405State v. Owen (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 405State v. Gaskin (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 406State v. Davis (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 407Like v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 415Doe v. Belmar (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 421Bockey v. Rasmussen (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 421State v. Ordoukhanian (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 423State of Tennessee v. Jonathan David Patterson (2018)
We granted this appeal to determine what showing, if any, a defendant must make to prevail on a motion for reduction of sentence under Rule 35 of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure, where the defendant pleaded guilty without an agreement as to sentencing, pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(B). The Court of Criminal Appeals held that a defendant must present post-sentencing information or developments warranting a reduction of sentence to prevail on a Rule 35 motion. We disagree and limit this standard to Rule 35 motions seeking reduction of specific sentences imposed in exchange for guilty pleas, pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals and reinstate the trial court's judgment granting the defendant's Rule 35 motion and reducing his aggregate sentence.
- 564 S.W.3d 436In re J.B. (2016)
- 564 S.W.3d 441in the Interest of A.L.M.-F., A.M., J.A.-F., N.A.-F., and E.A.-F., Children (2017)
- 564 S.W.3d 446M & M Resources, Inc. and Energy Land Resources v. DSTJ, LLP, DSTJ Corporation and Milestone Operating, Inc. (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 456In re O.T.A. (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 461Armando Iglesias v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 469Efren Saenz v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 474M.E.N. Water Supply Corporation, Angus Water Supply Corporation, Chatfield Water Supply Corporation, Corbet Water Supply Corporation, City of Frost, City of Kerens, and Community Water Company v. City of Corsicana, Texas (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 491First Bank v. DTSG, Ltd. and Richard Brumitt (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 497Christopher Doll Speck v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 501Taylor v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 512Davis v. Kelley (2019)
- 564 S.W.3d 516Anderson v. Kelley (2019)
- 564 S.W.3d 519Berger v. Gibson (2019)
- 564 S.W.3d 521Cunningham v. State (2019)
- 564 S.W.3d 524Lane v. State (2019)
- 564 S.W.3d 534Bambico v. Ouachita Indus., Inc. (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 537Rawls v. Yarberry (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 546Love v. O'Neal (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 550City of Bryant v. Boone Trust (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 555Hankook Tire Co. v. Philpot (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 558Schoolfield v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 563King v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 569Bradley v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 575Sweeten v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 579I.K. v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 584Adams v. Commonwealth (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 592Anderson v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 618State v. McWilliams (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 633Skaggs Chiropractic, L.L.C. v. Ford (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 641York v. Horner (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 649State v. Davis (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 665New Life Evangelistic Ctr. v. City of St. Louis (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 693Boggs v. Dir. of Revenue (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 702State v. Pults (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 703Hallam v. Mo. Dep't of Soc. Servs. (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 711Richardson v. Richardson (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 721Lehmann v. Fox C-6 Sch. Dist. (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 731State v. Townsel (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 741Potts v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 742Estate of Elder v. Estate of Pageler (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 742State v. Mahan (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 749Key v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 750State v. Evans (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 755State v. Declue (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 761Truong v. Truong (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 771Ray v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 780State v. Haynes (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 787Juvenile Officer v. D. P.C. (In re Interest of B.N.C.) (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 787Bram v. AT&T Mobility Servs., LLC (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 800Smith v. Capital Region Med. Ctr. (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 807Nationstar Mortg. LLC v. Wills (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 809State of Tennessee v. Westley A. Albright (2018)
The Defendant, Westley A. Albright, pled nolo contendere to one count of solicitation of a minor, a Class E felony, and was placed on judicial diversion, with a one-year probationary term. As part of his plea-agreement, the Defendant was required to register as a sex offender and to participate in sex offender treatment. After the Defendant was discharged from his treatment program for noncompliance, the Defendant's probation officer filed a Diversion Violation Report. Following a hearing, the trial court revoked the Defendant's diversion, adjudicated the Defendant guilty, extended the Defendant's probation by six months, and ordered the Defendant to attend and complete sex offender therapy. The Defendant appealed, and the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. We granted the Defendant's application for permission to appeal in order to determine whether the Defendant's due process rights were violated because he was not specifically informed in conjunction with his nolo contendere plea that his judicial diversion could be revoked if he refused to admit certain facts during his sex offender treatment. We hold that due process does not require a sex offender placed on judicial diversion with a probationary period to be informed specifically in conjunction with his plea that his judicial diversion and probation may be revoked if he is discharged from sex offender treatment due to his refusal to acknowledge that he committed the elements of the offense to which he pled. Accordingly, we affirm the courts below.
- 564 S.W.3d 830Jbs Carriers, Inc. and James Lundry v. Trinette L. Washington, Sophia Renee Lenzy, Thomas Charles Lenzy, Individually and as Representatives of the Estate of Mary L. Turner (2018)
<p> Justice Johnson delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Hecht, Justice Green, Justice Guzman, Justice Devine, Justice Brown, and Justice Blacklock joined. </p>
- 564 S.W.3d 843S&S Emergency Training Solutions, Inc. D/B/A Emergency Medical Training Services v. Sheila Elliott (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 850Carl Owens, Jr., Connie Owens, Michael Terry, and Sandi Terry v. the City of Tyler, Texas (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 852Dow Jones & Co. v. Highland Capital Mgmt., L.P. (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 902SM Architects, PLLC and Roger Stephens v. AMX Veteran Specialty Services, LLC (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 907Jonathan Wayne Atkinson v. State (2018)
- 564 S.W.3d 913Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Clear Vision Windshield Repair, LLC, Elizabeth Dutson, Bruce Houck, Greg Hineman, Matthew ONeill, and James McCubbin (2018)