Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 565 F.2d 286 - United States v. McCormick

United States v. McCormick’s Empirical Analysis

565 F.2d 286 · 1977

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
6
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently January 2008 · most notably United States v. Santiago (1978), United States v. Portsmouth Paving Corporation and R. Curtis Saunders, Jr. (1983)

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

2401977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 802 (§ 102 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on United States v. Jones · United States v. Stroupe · United States v. Vaught · United States v. Harper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.