Lee E. HASSIG, Appellant, v. Ray W. PEARSON, Jr. and A. T. Pearson, Appellees’s Empirical Analysis
565 F.2d 644 · 1977
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2018
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. · Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,773 Financial Industrial Fund, Inc., a Maryland Corporation v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, a Maryland Corporation · Williams v. Eaton · Harnett v. Ryan Homes, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because he had control, and was giving consideration to retiring and selling his own stock.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“there must be a substantial likelihood that the disclosure of the omitted fact would have been viewed by the reasonable investor as having significantly altered the 'total mix' of information made available.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.