In Re: Bertram Zweibon et Als’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
4 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2012
4 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Beacon Theaters Inc v. C Westover · Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. United States · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Barrett v. Zweibon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Pleadings. There shall be a complaint and an answer; a reply to a counterclaim denominated as such; an answer to a cross-claim, if the answer contains a cross-claim; a third-party complaint, if a person who was not an original party is summoned under the provisions of Rule 14; and a third-party answer, if a third-party complaint is served. No other pleading shall be allowed, except that the court may order a reply to an answer or a third-party answer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is now settled that the process of amendment may be initiated by presentation of an issue for the first time in a motion for summary judgment.”) (citations omitted). 4 . Loper v. Loper (In re Loper), 329 B.R. 704, 707 (10th Cir. BAP 2005). See also, In re Goin, 808 F.2d 1391, 1392 (10th Cir.1987) (per curiam). 5 . See Sampson, 997 F.2d at 722-723 (stating that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.