Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 565 F.2d 802 - United States v. Joseph J. C. Dicarlo, United States of America v. Ronald C. MacKenzie

United States v. Joseph J. C. Dicarlo, United States of America v. Ronald C. MacKenzie’s Empirical Analysis

565 F.2d 802 · 1977

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2001
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2001

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

901977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Imbler v. Pachtman · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · United States v. Nixon · O'Shea v. Littleton · Tenney v. Brandhove

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No member of the Legislative Assembly shall be arrested while the house of which he is a member is in session, or during the fifteen days before or after such session, except for treason, felony or breach of the peace. The members of the Legislative Assembly shall not be questioned in any other place for any speech, debate or vote in either house or in any committee.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “lesson on the alleged political facts of life in Boston could be taken as a thinly veiled reference to payoffs”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.