Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 565 F.2d 807 - SCM Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission

SCM Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission’s Empirical Analysis

565 F.2d 807 · 1977

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
December 2003
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2003 · most notably Securities & Exchange Commission v. Commonwealth Chemical Securities, Inc. (1978), TRW, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (1981)

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1701977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc. · Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “cognizable danger of recurrent violation”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is true that if the language of the statute is considered alone, the result is not clear. But the language of the section does not stand alone and should not be construed as though it did.... A corporation without fear of sanction could have the concededly prohibited interlocking directorate, and, if detected, simply replace the ousted director with another interlocking board member. Thus, policy supports a broad reading of section 8 and [the statute’s enforcement mechanism] indicates that such a construction is reasonable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “voluntary cessation of allegedly illegal conduct does not deprive the tribunal of power to hear and determine the case, i. e., does not make the case moot”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.