Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 565 F.2d 927 - United States v. Almand

United States v. Almand’s Empirical Analysis

565 F.2d 927 · 1978

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently June 2002 · most notably United States v. Miller (1978), United States v. Jerez (1997)

27 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

2301978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · United States v. Watson · Rachal v. United States · United States v. Worthington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he direction the vehicle was traveling, the likelihood that the vehicle was coming from an unpatrolled river area, the difficulty the driver had in stopping the vehicle, the sparsely populated area where the stop occurred, [the officers’] knowledge that local traffic did not normally travel the roads in question at such early hours of the morning and that the route in question was frequently traveled by persons transporting illegal aliens and contraband, with such activity taking place primarily in the late evening and early morning hours.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.