Usery v. Yates’s Empirical Analysis
565 F.2d 93 · 1977
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2024
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 213
Relies on Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc. · Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & Associates · Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Co. · Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co. · Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“which can never be sold at retail ... whatever the terms of the sale ... Sales of these items are nonretail whether made by truck stops or other establishments ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the overwhelming use of diesel fuel is in large trucks engaged in commercial, interstate transportation of goods.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.