Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 565 F.3d 1353 - United States v. Schultz

United States v. Schultz’s Empirical Analysis

565 F.3d 1353 · 2009

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
June 2025
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably United States v. Hoffman (2013), United States v. Holt (2015)

4 federal appellate ·

710200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77E (§ 5 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Faretta v. California · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Godinez v. Moran · Flanagan v. United States · Glidden Company v. Zdanok Lurk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “pinpoint the specific findings that the party disagrees with.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A party may serve and file objections to the [magistrate judge’s] order within 10 days after being served with a copy of a written order or after the oral order is stated on the record, or at some other time the court sets ... Failure to object in accordance with this rule waives a party’s right to review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.