Tawadrous v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
565 F.3d 35 · 2009
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Raza v. Gonzales · Ven v. Ashcroft · Tandayu v. Mukasey · Lemus v. Gonzales · Awad v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Crucially, this evidence must demonstrate the intensification or deterioration of country conditions, not their mere continuation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wanjiku v. Barr · Lin v. Barr“he ha[d] not described the particular evidence of changed country conditions submitted in conjunction with those successful motions to reopen”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Djokro v. Garland“point[ing] to five unpublished BIA orders reopening . . . removal proceedings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Djokro v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.