Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 565 F.3d 435 - United States v. Moore

United States v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

565 F.3d 435 · 2009

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably United States v. Irey (2010), United States v. Wisecarver (2011)

22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

320200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Gall v. United States · Rita v. United States · Johnson v. United States · Sells v. United States · Spence v. Educational Credit Management Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To qualify for relief under the plain error standard, [Carson] must show that the district court committed an error that is plain, that affects his substantial rights, and that seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “fails to consider a relevant factor that should have received significant weight, gives significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or considers only the appropriate factors but commits a clear error of judgment in weighing those factors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.