565 F. Supp. 2d 130 - Hamdan v. Gates’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 948A (§ 1802 of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act) · 10 U.S.C. § 948B (§ 1802 of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act) · 10 U.S.C. § 948D (§ 1802 of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act) · 10 U.S.C. § 948I (§ 1802 of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act) · 10 U.S.C. § 948J (§ 1802 of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act) · 10 U.S.C. § 948K (§ 1802 of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act) · 10 U.S.C. § 948R · 10 U.S.C. § 949A (§ 1802 of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act)
Relies on Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Chambers v. Florida · Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlin · Schlesinger v. Councilman · Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f the Military Commission judge gets it wrong, his error may be corrected by the CMCR. If the CMCR gets it wrong, it may be corrected by the D.C. Circuit. And if the D.C. Circuit gets it wrong, the Supreme Court may grant a writ of certiorari.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.