Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 565 NE2D 1089 - Cleff v. State

Cleff v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 2018

3 state decisions

10199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. McRae · Ball v. United States · Sidle v. Majors · Spevack v. Strauss · Rohrabaugh Ex Rel. Cross v. Wagoner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The defendant must be personally present at the time sentence is pronounced. If the defendant is not personally present when sentence is to be pronounced, the court may issue a warrant for his arrest."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[al trial court may conclude a defendant's absence from sentencing is knowing and voluntary when there is evidence the defendant knew the date of sentencing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Neither the United States Constitution nor the Indiana Constitution explicitly or implicitly secure[s] to a defendant the right to be present at sentencing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.