Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

565 N.E.2d 332

In re D'Amico

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1991

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1991-01-17

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-01-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 2019

3 state decisions

10199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER ACCEPTING RESIGNATION

¶2Comes now, William C. D’Amico, an attorney under investigation by the Disciplinary Commission of this Court, and tenders his affidavit of resignation pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 17.

¶3Upon examination of the matters pending in this case, we find that Respondent’s affidavit meets the necessary elements set forth in Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 17, and that such resignation should be accepted.

¶4IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED by this Court that the Petitioner, William C. D’Amico, is hereby removed as a member of the Bar of this State and that the Clerk of this Court strike such name from the roll of attorneys. To be eligible for reinstatement at a future date, the Respondent must comply with the provisions of Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 4.

¶5The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward notice of this Order in accordance with the provisions of Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 3(d) governing disbarment and suspension.

All justices concur.
/565/ne2d/332 · .json · Public domain