Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 565 NE2D 385 - Markham v. Prutsman Mirror Co.

Markham v. Prutsman Mirror Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2013

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

70199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Polius 85-3392 v. Clark Equipment Company 85-3393 · Havert v. Caldwell · 237 N.J. Super. 282 - Wilkerson v. CO Porter MacHinery Co. · Osgood v. Medical, Inc. · Wewoka Petroleum Corporation v. Gilmore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A successor, with reference to corporations, 'generally means another corporation which, through amalgamation, consolidation, or other legal succession, becomes invested with rights and assumes burdens of first corporation.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Under the well-settled rule of corporate law, where one company sells or transfers all of its assets to another, the second entity does not become liable for the debts and liabilities, including torts, of the transferor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Successor in assets lability, under these exceptions, takes place only when the predecessor corporation no longer exists, such as when a corporation dissolves or liquidates in bankruptcy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.