Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 565 P2D 51 - State v. Edens

State v. Edens’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 1997
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1997

7 state decisions

30197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Marion · Harvell v. State · Kovash v. State · Miller v. State · Stucker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]he requirement of a speedy trial as protected by the United States Constitution and Oklahoma Constitution is not applicable in cases such as this, wherein pre-accusation delay is involved. The right to a speedy trial, protected both by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Art. II, § 20, of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma is limited in application, by express terms, to an ‘accused’ and one is not an ‘accused’ until an information or indictment is filed, or where the person is in actual custody or has been arrested in the course of prosecution of the offense in question. . . (Citations omitted, footnote omitted)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . inasmuch as fixed jury terms have been abolished by S.B. 15, Ch. 134, § 2 of 1969 Session Laws, 32 Legislature, and since 22 O.S.1971, §§ 811 and 812 have not been repealed, we interpret these statutes to contemplate a reasonable period of delay.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.