Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 565 Pa. 79 - Commonwealth v. Gunter

Commonwealth v. Gunter’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · MacHibroda v. United States · Kemmerer v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing · Commonwealth v. Forbes · Commonwealth v. Shaffer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well-settled that the decision whether to permit a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea is within the sound discretion of the trial court. Although no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea exists in Pennsylvania, the standard applied differs depending on whether the defendant seeks to withdraw the plea before or after sentencing. When a defendant seeks to withdraw a plea after sentencing, he must demonstrate prejudice on the order of manifest injustice. [A] defendant may withdraw his guilty plea after sentencing only where necessary to correct manifest injustice. * * * Manifest injustice occurs when the plea is not tendered knowingly, intelligently, voluntarily, and understandingly. In determining whether a plea is valid, the court must examine the totality of circumstances surrounding the plea. Pennsylvania law presumes a defendant who entered a guilty plea was aware of what he was doing, and the defendant bears the burden of proving otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]lthough the effect of a plea of nolo contendere is equivalent to a plea of guilty, the import of the pleas is not the same. In pleading nolo contendere; the defendant does not admit his guilt, but merely consents to being punished as if he were guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “the tension ... between the individual's fundamental right to a trial and the need for finality in the proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.