Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 565 SO2D 104 - Ex Parte Carrell

Ex Parte Carrell’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · Florida Citrus Exposition, Inc. v. Hungerford Construction Co. · International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 323, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board · United States of America Ex Rel. Kahmid Solomon, Relator-Appellant v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden of Attica Prison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although ordinarily a mere assertion of a loss of memory is not enough of a showing of prejudice to support a finding that a defendant has been denied due process, where the delay is excessive and is the result of unexcused inaction by the State, the delay is prima facie prejudicial.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The right to a speedy trial is triggered when a criminal prosecution has begun.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'[I]t is either a formal indictment or information or else the actual restraints imposed by arrest and holding to answer a criminal charge that engage the particular protections of the speedy trial provision of the Sixth Amendment.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.