565 So. 2d 1163 - McCall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

cited by 30 later decisions

states following

February 2016

most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Hunt v. State (1994), 991 So. 2d 313 - McNabb v. State (2007)

30 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · United States v. Harriss · Parker v. Levy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“`There must be ascertainable standards of guilt. Men of common intelligence cannot be required to guess at the meaning of the enactment. The vagueness may be from uncertainty in regard to persons within the scope of the act, or in regard to the applicable tests to ascertain guilt.'”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Vann v. State · State v. Baker
“The overbreadth doctrine derives from the First Amendment, see Young v. American Mini Theatres , 427 U.S. 50 , 96 S.Ct. 2440 , 49 L.Ed.2d 310 (1976); Parker v. Levy , 417 U.S. 733 , 94 S.Ct. 2547 , 41 L.Ed.2d 439 (1974), and serves to invalidate legislation so sweeping that, along with its allowable proscriptions, it also restricts constitutionally-protected rights of free speech, press, or assembly, see e.g., Coates v. Cincinnati , 402 U.S. 611 , 91 S.Ct. 1686 , 29 L.Ed.2d 214 (1971).”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Woodard · 893 So. 2d 1239 - Hyshaw v. State
“"In addition to any penalties heretofore or hereafter provided by law for any person convicted of an unlawful sale of a controlled substance, there is hereby imposed a penalty of five years incarceration in a state corrections facility with no provision for probation if the situs of such unlawful sale was on the campus or within a one-mile radius 2 of the campus boundaries of any public or private school, college, university or other education institution in this state."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Jackson v. State · 593 So. 2d 155 - Jones v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.