Lewis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 1993
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 362 So. 2d 1296 - Anderson v. State · 501 So. 2d 1256 - Ex Parte Saranthus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Because the prosecution did not utilize the provisions of the Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without a State in Criminal Proceedings [§ 12-21-283, Code of Alabama 1975] or a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum or by any other means show that the witness was unavailable to testify, we cannot characterize the state’s efforts to produce the witness as having been made with due diligence or in good faith.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. M.M. v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.