565 So. 2d 1298 - Bryant v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

18 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “redacted statement [of the nontestifying codefendant] effectively inculpated the other codefendants and could have confused the jury about the extent of each one's participation.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 641 So. 2d 169 - Preston v. State

2. “any doubts as to the existence of a `likelihood' of impermissible bias must be resolved in the objecting party's favor,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 570 So. 2d 296 - Hall Ex Rel. Hall v. Daee

3. “when the jury could be confused or improperly influenced by evidence which applies to only one of several defendants.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Viniegra v. State