565 So. 2d 337 - Neely v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1991
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Mooney v. Holohan · 546 So. 2d 1037 - Richardson v. State · 266 So. 2d 661 - State v. Matera · 336 So. 2d 364 - Baker v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The role of the trial court, after we authorized a hearing on the coram nobis application, was to determine the validity .of the allegations. See Richardson [v. State] [ 546 So.2d 1037 ] [Fla.1989] at 1038. The trial court has determined that the allegations were valid, and since there is competent substantial evidence in the record to support that determination, we cannot disturb those findings any more than we could interfere with the original fact-finder’s decision on the motion for judgment of acquittal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.