Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 565 SO2D 346 - Carroll v. Dodsworth

Carroll v. Dodsworth’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2018

3 state decisions

10199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ryan v. Noble · Mizell v. New Kingsley Beach, Inc. · Holiday v. Holbrook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial judge has a duty to so direct the course of counsel's voir dire examination that the minds of the prospective jurors may not be infiltrated with ideas having no proper relation to the issue to be determined by them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he damage was compounded by the trial court's overruling of plaintiffs' timely objection and allowing defense counsel to repeat his improper question”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.