Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

565 So. 2d 915

Vance v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 29, 1990

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-08-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1991

1 state decisions

Relies on Osborne v. Ohio · Schmitt v. State · 501 So. 2d 190 - State v. Hutcheson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-08-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We reject appellant’s constitutional attacks on the authority of Schmitt v. State, 563 So.2d 1095 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); and Osborne v. Ohio, 495 U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1691, 109 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990).

¶2We agree with appellant that he was improperly sentenced under a category 2 scoresheet rather than a category 9 score-sheet. Category 2 covers only sexual offenses prosecuted under chapters 794 and 800 and section 826.04, Florida Statutes. Those statutes are not involved herein. See Robertson v. State, 559 So.2d 352 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) and Hutcheson v. State, 501 So.2d 190 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

¶3Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s conviction but remand with directions for re-sentencing consistent herewith.

ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., and FRANK, RICHARD H., Associate Judge, concur.
/565/so2d/915 · .json · Public domain