Zuckerman v. Bevin’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 703 · 29 U.S.C. § 1 · 29 U.S.C. § 102 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 104 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 141 (§ 1 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 151 (§ 1 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 164 (§ 14 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Vaca v. Sipes · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The General Assembly shall not pass local or special acts concerning any of the following subjects, or for any of the following purposes, namely: ... [t]o regulate the limitation of civil or criminal causes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. B.L. v. Schuhmann“a substantial and justifiable reason [must appear] from legislative history, from the statute's title, preamble or subject matter, or from some other authoritative source.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. B.L. v. Schuhmann“is to draw all reasonable inferences and implications from the act as a whole and thereby sustain its validity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. B.L. v. Schuhmann
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.