Howes v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis
565 U.S. 499 · 2012
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 7 district · 105 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Williams v. Taylor · Edwards v. Arizona · Berkemer v. McCarty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 173 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is a term of art that specifies circumstances that are thought generally to present a serious danger of coercion.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether the relevant environment presents the same inherently coercive pressures as the type of station house questioning at issue in Miranda.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]mprisonment alone is not enough to create a custodial situation within the meaning of Miranda.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.