Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 565 U.S. 65 - Hardy v. Cross

Hardy v. Cross’s Empirical Analysis

565 U.S. 65 · 2011

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
6
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably 135 F. Supp. 2d 551 - In Re Nice Systems, Ltd. Securities Litigation (2001), State v. Goins (2017)

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions

14020112020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · Barber v. Page · Felkner v. Jackson · Cross v. Hardy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[G]reat improbability that such efforts would have resulted in locating the witness, and would have led to her production at trial, neutralizes any intimation that a concept of reasonableness required their execution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[o]ne, in hindsight, may always think of other things.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “remained in constant contact with A.S. and her mother”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.