Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 566 F.2d 469 - Howell v. Thomas

Howell v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

566 F.2d 469 · 1978

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2011

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

4019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Bullock v. United States · Howell v. Jones · Kehoe v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “collaterally estop the effect of an already concluded prior proceeding.”). 3 . Of course, the father”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.