United States v. Juarez’s Empirical Analysis
566 F.2d 511 · 1978
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently September 1990 · most notably United States v. McRae (1979), United States v. Davis (1978)
41 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · South Dakota v. Nebraska · Thomas v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In evaluating a claim of insufficient evidence in accordance with the lesser standard [when the motion is not renewed], we must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60 , 80, 62 S.Ct. 457 , 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942), resolving all reasonable inferences and credibility choices in support of the jury’s verdict. United States v. Zweig, 562 F.2d 962 , 963 (5th Cir. 1977); United States v. Prout, 526 F.2d 380 , 384 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 840 , 97 S.Ct. 114 , 50 L.Ed.2d 109 (1976); United States v. Black, 497 F.2d 1039 , 1041 (5th Cir. 1974). To reverse we must find that a reasonably minded jury necessarily must have entertained a reasonable doubt as to defendant’s guilt. United States v. Haggins, 545 F.2d 1009 , 1013 (5th Cir. 1977).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.