Mam v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
566 F.3d 280 · 2009
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2024
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pan v. Gonzales · Segran v. Mukasey · Dhima v. Gonzales · Muñoz-Monsalve v. Mukasey · Stroni v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where, as here, the BIA adopted and affirmed the IJ’s ruling, but also discussed some of the bases for the IJ’s opinion,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barsoum v. Holder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.