Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 566 F.3d 303 - Poupore v. Astrue

Poupore v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis

566 F.3d 303 · 2009

Citation profile

113
cited by 113 later decisions
April 2022
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 113 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Selian v. Astrue (2013), Punzio v. Astrue (2011)

7 federal appellate · 5 district ·

1060200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital · Sims v. Apfel · Norton v. Sam's Club · Schaal v. Apfel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 113 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is well-supported by medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques and is not inconsistent with the other substantial evidence in [the claimant's] case record.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he Commissioner need only show that there is work in the national economy that the claimant can do; [she] need not provide additional evidence of the claimant's residual functional capacity.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Substantial evidence means 'more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.