Byrum v. Landreth’s Empirical Analysis
566 F.3d 442 · 2009
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Texas v. United States (2015), Janvey v. Alguire (2011)
28 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Western District Court)
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292
Relies on Elrod v. Burns · Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York · Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. · Swint v. Chambers County Commission · Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. Fox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, (2) a substantial threat of irreparable injury if the injunction is not issued, (3) that the threatened injury if the injunction is denied outweighs any harm that will result if the injunction is granted, and (4) that the grant of an injunction will not disserve the public interest.”
18 later decisions quote this exact passage“the State could have eliminated any constitutional challenge here by not limiting use of the terms 'interior design' and 'interior designer' but by allowing only designers who satisfy its licensing qualifications to represent themselves as 'licensed' interior designers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“A preliminary injunction is an 'extraordinary remedy.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.