Day v. Quarterman’s Empirical Analysis
566 F.3d 527 · 2009
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Rompilla v. Beard · Schriro v. Landrigan · Brown v. Payton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1)Name the witness (2) Demonstrate that the witness was available to testify and would have done so (3) Set out the content of the witness’s proposed testimony, and (4) Show that the testimony would have been favorable to a particular defense.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.