Stark v. Moran’s Empirical Analysis
566 F.3d 676 · 2009
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 363 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 554
Relies on Kabro Associates of West Islip, LLC v. Colony Hill Associates · Fidelity Bank National Ass'n v. M.M. Group, Inc. · Hyundai Translead, Inc. v. Jackson Truck & Trailer Repair, Inc. · Moran v. LTV Steel Co. · In re Harwald Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may exist where [the] ... bidder challenges the intrinsic structure of the sale because it is tainted by fraud, mistake, or unfairness.”). Those circumstances do not exist here. . The purchase agreement signed by the Trustee and Golden Boy provides that Golden Boy is obligated to close the transaction if closing can occur before April 24, 2014. . The Court does not believe the integrity of judicial sales was compromised in this case. The bidding procedures and sale order required Court approval of any sale, which was to be based on a finding that the proposed sale”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Sunland, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.