Riddle v. Riddle’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2010
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 173 Ind. App. 661 - Wilcox v. Wilcox · 179 Ind. App. 378 - Hiscox v. Hiscox · Wilhelm v. Wilhelm · Neffle v. Neffle · Shumaker v. Shumaker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for an asset to come within the ambit of 'property,' one or both of the spouses must have a vested present interest in the asset.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bizik v. Bizik
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.