Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 566 P2D 1229 - Maple v. Maple

Maple v. Maple’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
December 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2005

4 state decisions

201977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 24 Utah 2d 236 - Wiese v. Wiese · 129 Cal. App. 2d 150 - Nevins v. Nevins · 26 Ariz. App. 89 - Noble v. Noble · Evans v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Appellant’s] counsel represents that he has gone to a great deal of trouble to determine and show that under the law of Thailand, a marriage with one already married is a nullity. Rule 9, Utah Rules of Evidence provides that this can be done by obtaining a copy of the law and presenting it to the court. But we do not see any difficulty here from failing to do so. The rule is that unless the law of a foreign jurisdiction is proved to be otherwise, it will be presumed to be the same as the law of the forum state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If the parties have accumulated any property or acquired any obligations subsequent to the marriage, or there is a genuine need arising from economic change of circumstances due to the marriage, ... the court may make temporary and final orders, and subsequently modify the orders, relating to ... their property ... as may be equitable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.