Gaharan v. STATE, DOTD’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2012
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 381 So. 2d 378 - Flowers v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · 328 So. 2d 69 - Dean v. Hercules Incorporated · Poole v. Guste · 404 So. 2d 896 - J. Weingarten, Inc. v. Northgate Mall, Inc. · 500 So. 2d 390 - Lyman v. Town of Sunset
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“|s Although a proprietor may do with his estate whatever he pleases, still he cannot make any work on it, which may deprive his neighbor of the liberty of enjoying his own, or which may be the cause of any damage to him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The fact that the circumstances may ultimately result in effectively withholding from the DOTD the enjoyment of the benefits of the accrual of prescription of the damage claims, is irrelevant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“private property is damaged for public purposes, i.e., when a public body going about public business is the damage-causing neighbor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.