Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 566 SO2D 1032 - State v. Semien

State v. Semien’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Sepulvado · State v. Goodman · 430 So. 2d 627 - State v. Harper · 368 So. 2d 975 - State v. Catanese

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]ven though any reference to the results of a polygraph test would be improper, an appellate court will not automatically reverse a conviction whenever an impermissible reference to a polygraph exam is made during a criminal trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.