Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 566 SO2D 1380 - State v. Moo Young

State v. Moo Young’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 1999
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 280 So. 2d 426 - Newman v. Carson · 529 F. Supp. 1006 - Mid-Fla Coin Exchange, Inc. v. Griffin · 615 F. Supp. 141 - Diversified Numismatics, Inc. v. City of Orlando

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “either ... (1) fail to give fair notice to persons of common intelligence as to what conduct is required or proscribed; or (2) encourage arbitrary and erratic enforcement.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.