State v. Frisard’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · 416 So. 2d 109 - State v. Broussard · 423 So. 2d 1111 - State v. Hayes · 360 So. 2d 166 - State v. Wilson · 324 So. 2d 451 - State v. Bell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“due process may be offended both when there is a promise which is later broken and when the defendant justifiably believes that there is a promise which is later broken.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.