566 So. 2d 758 - Ex Parte State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Ex Parte State (1992), 629 So. 2d 51 - Nichols v. State (1993)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 510 So. 2d 135 - Ex Parte Williams · 508 So. 2d 218 - Ex Parte Glover · 473 So. 2d 1125 - Hinton v. State · Jackson v. State · Jackson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The State correctly points out that [ Ex parte] Glover [ 508 So.2d 218 ((Ala. 1987)], and [ Ex parte] Williams [ 510 So.2d 135 (Ala.1987) ], stand for the proposition that the Habitual Felony Offender Act cannot be applied if the defendant was not given proper notice before the first sentencing hearing; but those cases have nothing to do with what convictions the State can or cannot attempt to use at a later sentencing hearing. Indeed, Hinton v. State, 473 So.2d 1125 (Ala.1985), and Porter v. State, 505 So.2d 1292 (Ala. Cr.App.1986), both stand for the proposition that the State may use at a second sentencing hearing convictions other than those it used at the first hearing, provided that proper notice had been given both times ...."”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ash v. State · Ex Parte State“`a judgment of [a Court of Appeals] is not final until that court issues its certificate of judgment'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Robinson v. State · Veteto v. Yocum
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.