Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 566 SW2D 16 - Storms v. Tuck

Storms v. Tuck’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1979
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Drye v. Eagle Rock Ranch, Inc. · Adams v. Rowles · Bickler v. Bickler · Coleman v. Forister · Roberts v. Haltom City

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““THAT WE, H. H. STORMS and wife, JULIA STORMS, . . . have GRANTED, CONVEYED, and by these presents do GRANT and CONVEY unto the said RUTH MILLS, ... her heirs and assigns, the free and uninterrupted use, liberty, privilege and easement of passing in, on, upon and along a certain way [describing the bounds of the easement] . . . together with free ingress, egress and regress to and for the said RUTH MILLS, her heirs and assigns, and her tenants, by foot, with carts, wag ons, carriages, automobiles and other vehicles, horses, mules or livestock, as by her shall be necessary or convenient at all times and seasons forever, in, along, upon and out of said way; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all and singular the rights and privileges aforesaid unto her, the said RUTH MILLS, her heirs and assigns, to her proper use and behoof, in common, however, with Grantors herein, the said H. H. STORMS and wife, JULIA STORMS, their heirs and assigns.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.