Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 566 SW2D 161 - Codell Construction Co. v. Commonwealth

Codell Construction Co. v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2017

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

6019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 65 Cal. 2d 777 - Wunderlich v. State of California Ex Rel. Department of Public Works · MacArthur Bros. v. United States · O'Neill Construction Co. v. Philadelphia · 9 Ariz. App. 564 - ASHTON COMPANY, INC., CONTR. & ENG'RS v. State · 102 Ga. App. 254 - State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by an express and unqualified disclaimer as to the accuracy of the information.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In a situation where the information and representations are intended to be suggestive of construction conditions, or the contract provides that they are to be taken as estimates only, then the governmental agency is not to be held accountable for variances which may be encountered on the job when there is no deliberate misrepresentation or fraud involved. (See the numerous out-of-state citations therein cited.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “This claim was made in a timely fashion and the trial court was correct in not dismissing the matter because of the statute of limitations provision of KRS 44.-310. The cause of action did not arise until February 17, 1972, when the Commonwealth advised the Appellant of what it was willing to pay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.