Hemphill v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 53 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably 168 Wis. 2d 509 - State v. Knight (1992), Nave v. Delo (1995)
8 federal appellate · 53 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Swenson v. Bosler · Crosswhite v. State · State v. Duren · State v. Thompson · Swenson v. Donnell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`It is there the briefs are presented, argument heard and the effect of the conduct of appellate counsel as it bears on the issue of”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“to set aside a judgment of conviction for infirmities arising from trial proceedings only,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Nave v. Delo · Nave v. Delo““Relief from defects in proceedings before the appellate courts are beyond the scope of the remedy and such relief should be sought only in the appellate court of rendition and there by motion to recall the mandate, vacate the sentence of affirmance and redocket the cause for rehearing.” Hemphill v. State, supra. [15, 16].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Zweifel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.