Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 566 SW2D 861 - Pace v. State

Pace v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
3
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably 414 So. 2d 998 - Dickerson v. State (1982), State v. Hammersley (1983)

39 state decisions

17019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Falk · United States v. Cowan · Stiller v. State · International Harvester Company v. Carr · Underwood v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The statute vests in the prosecuting attorney the decision as to whether a given defendant is suitable for pretrial diversion and the terms under which diversion will be granted. However, that discretion is not unbridled: It must be exercised so as to serve the interests of justice. (Citations omitted.) To that end, it is subject to review by the trial court upon proper application by the defendant.” Pace v. State, Tenn., 566 S.W.2d 861, 864 (1978).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “As to the holding that the caption of the amending act was defective under the requirements of Article II, Section 17 of the Constitution of Tennessee, it is fundamental that defects in the caption of the amendatory act, if any, were cured through subsequent action of the legislature codifying the amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.