Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 567 F.2d 1255 - Schifalacqua v. CNA Ins.

Schifalacqua v. CNA Ins.’s Empirical Analysis

567 F.2d 1255 · 1977

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
January 2002
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2002

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

1201977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Pittsburgh · Blofsen v. CUTAIAR · Lantz v. Vermont L. Ins. · Dougherty, Tr. v. Thomas, Exr. · Elaine Panizzi and Louis T. Gedeon, Jr., Administrators of the Estate of Louis T. Gedeon, Deceased v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Elaine Panizzi and Louis T. Gedeon, Jr., Administrators of the Estate of Elaine Edith Gedeon, Deceased v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Pennsylvania . . . “the doctrine of implied waiver . . . applies only to situations involving circumstances equivalent to an estoppel, and the person claiming the waiver to prevail must show that he was misled and prejudiced thereby . . Brown v. City of Pittsburgh, 409 Pa. 357, 360-61 , 186 A.2d 399, 401 (1962) (emphasis in original) (citations and footnote omitted). Goodwin v. Hartford Life Insurance Co., 491 F.2d 332 , 333 n.l (3d Cir. 1974).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.