United States v. Del Prete’s Empirical Analysis
567 F.2d 928 · 1978
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably United States v. Sanclemente-Bejarano (1988), United States v. Jaramillo-Suarez (1988)
16 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on McCarthy v. United States · United States v. Journet · Bunker v. Wise · United States v. Harris · United States v. Wolak
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for a further hearing at which the defendant must be permitted to enter a new plea”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Requesting a defendant to review and sign a written document setting forth the advice required by rule 11(c) is a proper procedure that may be of substantial assistance to the defendant in understanding the consequences of his plea, but it is emphatically not a substitute for the clear dictates of the rule which requires that the trial judge address the defendant in open court as to each of such matters.” (Emphasis added.) 567 F.2d at 930 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Browning
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.